Re: [idn] Summary of TS-SC discussion

[Eric Brunner <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

> 2) No widely-accepted official standard table yet exists. Multiple 
> different tables exist.

Is non-uniqueness the problem that bars scoping SC/TC equivialency rules at
global via nameprep?

Is uniformity of use among two or more different tables the problem that bars
scoping SC/TC equivalency rules at global via nameprep?

How would we know when one of the existing multiple different tables became
the widely-accepted prevalent table?

If our issue is qualitative, then it may not be traditional engineering,
which contains cost/benefit evaluation and optimization.

If our issue is quantitative, then it may be traditional engineering, and
a "best (present and/or projected) fit" of cost/benefit choices made.

I want to know what data exists, not just what some preferences are.

Eric