Re: [idn] Is The IDN WGroup Still Active? Fwd: [IDNList] Registrar

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

> It may lead to inconsistent exception conditions due to 
> changes in language specific normalization procedure. 
>  For example, a UCS code point A in language tag T is 
> excluded in Version X, as there is no blocking for any 
> UCS code points in place yet.  Due to upgrade Version X+1, 
> T(A) has been newly included tagged code blocks, then
>  an input contains A  fail in Version X, but will succeed
>  in Version X+1.  Due to failure in X will be coded with a 
> defaulted ACE as a legal name, then the same input 
> will not be fail in X+1, an inconsistency will resulted. 

See nameprep-08. it is discussed extensively how to deal with
this situation.
 
> If the WG has consensus on NOT using language tag
> mechanism, it is better to voice this and let 
> VeriSign users go ahead.

dont see how verisign testbed have anything to do with idn wg.
please keep things in focus.

-James Seng