Re: [idn] WG Update

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Note: Until the I-D is published, reviewed and accepted into wg pool,
the wg have to proceed as if this activity does not happened.

The wg cannot wait or delay its schedule waiting for non-wg activities.

-James Seng


----- Original Message -----
From: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
To: <liana.ydisg@juno.com>
Cc: <yves@realnames.com>; <liana.ydisg@juno.com>; <jseng@pobox.org.sg>;
<idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] WG Update


As one of the participants, I guess one of the drafts will  come out
late october or early november.

Soobok

----- Original Message -----
From: <liana.ydisg@juno.com>
To: <lsb@postel.co.kr>
Cc: <yves@realnames.com>; <liana.ydisg@juno.com>; <jseng@pobox.org.sg>;
<idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] WG Update


> Thank you for telling me this, could you please
> update me, where they are?  When do I expect
> to see the draft?
>
> Liana
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:05:57 +0900 "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
writes:
> >
> > CJK participants are working hard offline to prepare  drafts for
> > new solution
> > for TC/SC/Kanji equivalence within IDNA architecture .
> >
> > Please take this into consideration before making further progress
> > on your own.
> > Thanks
> >
> > Soobok
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <liana.ydisg@juno.com>
> > To: <yves@realnames.com>
> > Cc: <liana.ydisg@juno.com>; <jseng@pobox.org.sg>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: [idn] WG Update
> >
> >
> > > You are correct on what you have said here.  But
> > > what I have said is correct too.  TC/SC mapping
> > > are examples of semantic equivalence and
> > > Unicode has not deal with them.
> > >
> > > So do some TC/SC equivalence in Kanji.
> > >
> > > Liana
> > >
> > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 19:52:11 -0700 Yves Arrouye
> > <yves@realnames.com>
> > > writes:
> > > > > I disagree Unicode Consortium to the WG dated 02Sept
> > > > > recommendation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unicode has been very effective to collect scripts and glyphs
> > > > > of all scripts, and even comes up with Unified CJK character
> > > > > set, which is essential for IDN implementation.  I call this
> > > > >  the FIRST level of look-alike equivalence.
> > > >
> > > > Unicode does not collect glyphs but characters (and cf. section
> > 2.1
> > > > of UTR
> > > > #17, http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/). This is a
> > > > fundamental
> > > > property of the Unicode standard. I am everything but a CJK
> > expert,
> > > > but
> > > > along the same idea, the Han characters were unified because
> > they
> > > > meant the
> > > > same thing (semantics) not because of glyph similarities.
> > > >
> > > > YA
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>