RE: [idn] call for comments for REORDERING

["Kenny Huang" <huangk@alum.sinica.edu>]

as a chinese i am quite happy with 8-bit clean DNS, nor have i heard TWNIC or
CNNIC registration stop due to BIG5/GB stored in the resource records. Besides,
both NIC provide resolution service, one step ahead Verisign service. 
If the discussion is based on this kind of scenario, that will be an endless loop.

> I like to see some quantify prove for this.
> 
> as a chinese i am quite happy without reordering. (in fact, i am already
> happy with utf5 15 label limtation but thats another story). nor have i
> heard verisign (or other registries) registration stop due to lack of
> reordering for CJK.
> 
> > Other european folks but You martin (han experts),
> > won't install han/hangeul fonts even in his/her PCs, i guess.
> > Most europeans will see leaked ACE labels sometime in the future
> > when IDN host/email addresses are everywhere and interchanged globally
> > like LDH ones.  surely,
> 
> > IDNA WITHOUT REORDERING also become pains for non-CJK folks.
> 
> so u mean a "zq--dskjssdljdssdds32" is better than
> "zq--jdzpzxcklxx9jspsddsdsd" to naked eye? I cant believe this
> statement.

These encoding are transparent to USER (NAKED EYE). Of course you should know it.

Kenny Huang