Re: [idn] call for comments for REORDERING

["Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
 > What I meant is that e.g. somebody goes ahead and
> implements reordering based on one of your tables.
> Then e.g. the IETF includes reordering in IDN
> (Don't misunderstand me, this is only an example,
> of course I think this should never happen.), but
> with a different table based on newer statistics.
> The original implementer doesn't catch that he has
> a different table, and as a result, we have total
> chaos, nothing matches.

But newer reordering table with newer statistics
cannot be deployed without new ACE PREFIX, as i said many times.

But current nameprep rules out the possibility of
newer PREFIX. Therefore, newer reordering table would not
occur until this objection to future new prefix is
un-freezed and lifted up by IETF.

With new prefix, there won't occur any confusion problems you raised
regarding to REORDERING.

Soobok Lee

> 
> In comparison, if somebody by chance gets an old
> NFC/KC table, a few labels won't match, but it won't
> be a whole script or more that gets ruined.
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
>