Re: [idn] Which lanuages/scripts to reorder?

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>]

Eric, 

> The process, if any, of future revision of thie WG's product, again, if any,
> is important. Either there is none, and it is "permanent" until discarded,
> or there is some, which may work (allowing semi-graceful revisioning).

This is assuming that the WG actually produces something.
My concern in the area of reordering is that incremental requests for
supporting additional laguages/scripts for reordering benefits might mean
that the WG never gets to deliver anything - there are just too many
scripts/languages that can appear.

Thus my concern is completely unrelated to the version issues
others have brought up with respect to UTC.

If the WG embarks on doing reordering for 1,2,3,4 languages/scripts
how do we know that this will be sufficient? Next month there might be
requests for a few more languages/scripts. Etc.

  Erik