Re: [idn] call for comments for REORDERING

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

Mark,

...
> 2. If it were adopted, to ensure stability of IDN over time, the reordering
> should absolutely be permanent -- never changed in the future, even if new
> characters are added. ...

This is a different issue than the one raised by Erik Nordmark, which has to
do with WG process (exit criteria), and iterations of proposals to consider
reordering.

Does the same stability of IDN over time requirement lead to the same
conclusion for other transformations of blocks of code-points?

What is the "stability of IDN over time" requirement more specifically, and
in particular to reordering(s) that are not "absolutely [] permanent"? If
this question has already been answered, feel free to point to the item in
the archive where the answer can be found.

Eric