Re: [idn] call for comments for REORDERING<4.2.0.58.J.20011022121250.037081e0@localhost>

[Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>]

At 20:24 01/10/22 +0900, Soobok Lee wrote:
>Thanks for detailed history of Hangul in unicode.
>But including 11172 hangul made Unicode more useful and
>widely acceptable to korean community, because existing
>KS5601's 2350 or more hangul has been criticized for not being
>able to serve many scholarly purpose or book publishings.
>
>The pain for inclufing 11172 hangul  was REWARDED!

It was quite a pain. And it is the reason you are now
asking for reordering, which would again be a very
serious pain, with not enough rewards.

If you could chose among:

a) Having the Unicode 1.1 layout, with the rest of the
    modern syllables either encoded with Jamos or in
    a separate area, thus favoring compression with
    ACE-Z over regularity.

b) Having the current block, without reordering, and
    therefore with slight inefficiency for ACE-Z.

Which one would you chose? Which one would other
people in Korea prefer, according to your opinion?

At some point, we cannot have the cake and eat it too.

Regards,   Martin.