Re: [idn] Which lanuages/scripts to reorder?

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>]

> seamless upgrade idea for adding new script reordering tables and new
> nameprep rules (NF/casemappings) are described in the posting titled with
> "suggestion : two prefices ....". No newer prefix other than (zq-- and uq--)
> will be needed forever. I recommend you to comment on the suggestion first
> before you go further.

Soobok,

We seem to have a failure to communicate.
I've placed one new concern on the table which does not have anything to
do with how you could technically upgrade to new reordering tables.

My concern is about that the process of definition reordering tables
might never terminate (or might take a decade or so) since there might very
well be a request to add more and more languages/scripts to the tables before
we ever get to produce a single RFC.

I do not have anything to add to the techical issue of how upgrade
to new reordering tables as that was not the issue over which 
I expressed concern. Thus it makes no sense to me to comment on that issue.


Sincerely,
  Erik