Re: [idn] Which lanuages/scripts to reorder?

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>]

> Therefore, your concerns about long path of reordering revisioning is NOT
> new problem,but rather just one of never-terminaing nameprep/ACE revisioning
> problem.

I think they are very different.

nameprep/stringprep would probably need to be revised if there are Unicode code
points added before the document becomes an RFC.

My point about reordering is that it might need to be revised
each time somebody requests adding support for one of the 
languages/scripts that are already supported in Unicode, even if Unicode
doesn't add anything. I don't know how many languages/scripts
that Unicode currently support but the number is presumably a few hundered.

  Erik