Re: [idn] REORDERING: stability issues and UTC solutions

["Mark Davis" <mark@macchiato.com>]

I will mention also http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/, which shows the future
planned allocations.

Mark
—————

Δός μοι ποῦ στῶ, καὶ κινῶ τὴν γῆν — Ἀρχιμήδης
[http://www.macchiato.com]

----- Original Message -----
From: <DougEwell2@cs.com>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: <lsb@postel.co.kr>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 23:08
Subject: Re: [idn] REORDERING: stability issues and UTC solutions


> In a message dated 2001-10-22 8:41:07 Pacific Daylight Time,
lsb@postel.co.kr
> writes:
>
> >  Instead of NFC, some script may need CASE mappings, i guess.
> >  Current nameprep/ACE produce case-insensitively equivalent labels
> >  for IDN  X.com and x.com.
> >  Do you mean that all newly added SCRIPT won't have any case mapping ?
>
> Of course there will be new scripts added to Unicode/10646 that have case
> mappings (although those proposed for Unicode 3.2 do not).  But I thought
we
> were talking about reordering, not case mappings. I fear, once again, that
> the subject is being changed to divert us from the real issues surrounding
> the reordering proposal.
>
> >  Doug,
> >  If you have lists of new scripts pending for approval,
> >  please post them to this list for non-unicode experts.
>
> See <http://www.unicode.org/pending/pending.html>.  This location always
has
> the most up-to-date list of proposed scripts, along with an indication of
how
> far along the "pending" path they are.
>
> -Doug Ewell
>  Fullerton, California
>
>