Re: [idn] Which lanuages/scripts to reorder?

["Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <DougEwell2@cs.com>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: <lsb@postel.co.kr>; <mark@macchiato.com>; <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>; <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] Which lanuages/scripts to reorder? 


> In a message dated 2001-10-23 8:36:48 Pacific Daylight Time, lsb@postel.co.kr 
> writes:
> 
> >  Reordering won't be changed and  remains as sub-optimal frequency tables
> >  forever without new prefix, as i repeated many time in this list.
> >
> >  What i mean is adding NEW reordering tables for *NEW SCRIPTS*
> >  in accordance with new SCRIPT support in newer nameprep.
> >  I agree with you that reordering table for old existing scripts should not 
> >  be changed .
> 
> Reordering is, first and last, based on the tables.  If you create new 
> tables, you have by definition created a new version of reordering.  I don't 
> think you can say "reordering won't be changed" and then suggest one sentence 
> later that new tables could be added in the future.

yes. you are right. I missed "tables" in the first sentence.
"  Reordering <tables> won't be changed " is the right one.

Regards,
Soobok Lee


> 
> However, I'm sure everyone will at least be glad to see that existing tables 
> would not be touched.



> 
> -Doug Ewell
>  Fullerton, California
>