Re: [idn] (bias) summary of reordering discussion

[David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

James Seng/Personal wrote:
> Of the people participate in the reordering discussion
> 
[snip]
> David Hopwood - (no conclusion from comments)

Make that an explicit objection - I think it's far too complicated to
justify the marginal benefits. Also, any changes or additions to
reordering would have disastrous consequences for name comparison, and
Soobok Lee's zq--/uq-- proposal does not fix this.

- -- 
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5  0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBO9Xd1TkCAxeYt5gVAQH3Zwf+LohUgxC4xfXulqSzQbzBGb/GYkHkE7di
rGpy7qcujsmoW9PPIcGkCppUvyQatxmGSkV9v4STyR1+sD1ea8XMXQy+I8hY7F4r
6oKYA6UMzXTwhIaZ3HPe0nAWjmbF59w/1WjGPFP2GJuu0Ol5+ZwF686DCDOoPNc+
upkF05YuXFUwS7L99RR+0w1CGkOmdoj3Cl577sXJ36WMNj760yG5Gd29KjfT3ucl
8Yk6KjaynT0ppDcX1ZIay5e0BAGmHbrlcaGmRYTXodWMvoNhP4JHuJvW6dfMrY1t
4qJJcTfFsj1qSV3fDZRbCqczIY0gYYxzsCyJbILmGHNndi26cE4wyw==
=FF+E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----