Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

James,

If everything I wrote about was you, not the charter, the items, and some
parts of the WG process, "you" are very ... large, and the charter, work
items, and some part of the WG process very ... small.

I don't see it that way.

I do think there are things you can do to be a more effective chair, but
you'll have to listen to someone you can listen to. Make the smallest set
of changes to the charter you can, keep and post clear dates and process
milestones, be civil to everone, seperate your self from your works, and
from the WG's works, delegate, use your co-chair, get better use out of
your tech advisors (John's departures into LDAP and Harald's worship of
Unicode can't be their only uses), and work on your parinoia. Just because
I think you are vastly less than perfect doesn't mean I'm trying to make
you less -- I've got better things to do.

This isn't netnews, it isn't the James Seng show, and this isn't real work.
Drafts are.

Now I'm going to give this a rest.

Eric