RE: [idn] Re: stringprep and unassigned code points

[Yves Arrouye <yves@realnames.com>]

> I finished careful reading your clear answers titled with
>  "Re: [idn] questions: unassigned code points in nameprep".
> 
> What I understand is:
> 
>   "saved string" :  generated ACE labels by applications
>                       with known version of nameprep
> 
>   "query"        :  received ACE label from other applications
>                       the ACE label may have been generated by
>                          unknown version of nameprep
> 
>  from this understanding,
> 
>  1) I will prefer to use "generated ACE label" and "received ACE label".
>  They seem to be  more intuitive.

I don't think they really are more intuitive; the names still do not convey
the main point you wanted to show, which that the Nameprep version info is
known somehow. I understood the previous names better (at least query, in
the spirit of programming defensively and being prepared for the unassigned
code points).

Anybody cares to find good names conveying this (versioned/dated ACE label
and unversioned/undated ACE label do not sound that much better, form what I
could come up with)?

YA