[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2



Thanks Erik. Yes, that is what I mean.

Discussion of the points raised by David can and should continue.

But dont expect any update to the doc for a while.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Nordmark" <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>
To: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Cc: "David Hopwood" <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>; <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2


>
> > > have not been adequately addressed (in fact none of my technical
> > points
> > > were addressed at all).
> >
> > Your comments comes after the doc have been moved forward for IESG.
Any
> > changes to it will have to wait after their review.
>
> The WG should discuss the comments and they can even decide how they'd
like
> to modify the document.
> But it is best to not issue an updated I-D until the AD review
comments
> are back.
>
>   Erik
>