Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

Agree with Martin too.

But clarification: whether stringprep should be within IDN wg is a bit
more complex. Obviously with the dependency, it should be.

-James Seng

> Martin is right: we cannot finish nameprep until stringprep is
> finished. If the WG chairs don't want it as part of the WG, that's
> fine, but it is going to go through the same IETF last call as
> nameprep will. There is no reason not to have it in this WG.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium