Re: [idn] Re: [JET-member 464] Re: Fw: Re: new members invitation

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

> Is this better?

Nope.

You brought up "how much V charges per name or B charges per cert etc and
 how much it would cost C to use it".

I don't think these are relevant, and as your reply to LM Tseng was:
  > But the arguments for inclusive of TC/SC or not should be done on a pure
  > technical evaluation basis in IETF. Economy arguments as above is not a
  > factor for consideration.
it appears that you characterizing a fundamental scaling property of any
sequence of binary-valued tokens -- the 2^^N problem, as non-technical. You
also wrote:
  > This is considered Layer 9 aka `political' issues from IETF perspective..

I don't agree.

It doesn't change the scaling property to associate Verisign price points
or bits of colored glass to the required user- and registry-acts and the
stored state required for each if TC/SC isn't included.

Eric