Re: [idn] Re: [JET-member 443] Re: Fw: Re: new members invitation

[=?utf-8?B?dHNlbmdsbUDoqIjntrLkuK3lv4Mu5Lit5aSnLnR3?= <tsenglm@cc.ncu.edu.tw>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC"
> =?utf-8?B?dHNlbmdsbUDoqIjntrLkuK3lv4Mu5Lit5aSnLnR3?= wrote:
> >              If an Engineering Requirement is not related to the user's
cost
> >and what are user need that must be a very interest projects.
>
> There is no inherent cost to multiple registrations. All registration
> cost is assigned by the registry (and, in some models, by the
> registry's agents, the registrars). A registry can have a policy that
> "if many names have identical meanings, all those names are
> registered for the same fee as a single name". It is up to the
> registry to decide what "identical" and "meanings" is, of course. For
> every language, there are different guidelines for those two words;
> it would be good to have some common advice on various languages.
>
         I think  the cost assigned by the registry is the service charge.
it is not the inherent cost of multiple registrations of TC/SC name.
Charging can be reduced to zero by policy but the overhead or
non-effectiveness in technologies is inherent cost in the method or approach
, it is always evaluated and based them to improve or to  make decision.
         Some user register one domain name and setup a DNS to extend his
domain service for organizations' host name. To handle the multiple TC/SC
name registry is an overhead to treat them, the size of storage and the time
for careful treatment is an inherent cost of  complexity. The complexity
come from a neglection to reduce them in a proper level .  That complexity
and cost will let the system manager try to not provide TC/SC multple
records in his managed zone file, then the stability and trust to use CJK
domain name will be very low. Finally , it come back to reflect it is not a
workable approach.
> >   I think many
> >members in IDN WG of IETF also like to know the detail .
>
> Yes, exactly. This discussion has elicited a lot of detail that was
> unknown to many people before now.
>
> >   You give me a very
> >strange impression of IETF.  Can someone in IETF can help more ?
>
> If you listen to just one person's description of the IETF, you are
> sure to get a skewed picture. If you listen to many peoples'
> descriptions, you can weight and combine them yourself. The IETF is
> an extremely open organization. The mailing lists of all the WGs are
> freely available. And everyone has an email address at which you can
> contact them. :-)
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium
>
         Thanks your good suggestion.
L.M.Tseng