Note: WG Process - Was Re: [idn] Traditional-simplified, yet again

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

I like to remind everyone that if a draft is not published AND have not
been accepted into this working group, the draft is as good as not exist
in the view of the working group. We will not and cannot wait
indefinately. Neither should we stall the process on a REAL-SOON-NOW
draft.

The working group should, must and will proceed with the drafts
currently in its pool, currently:

Internationalizing Host Names In Applications
(IDNA)(draft-ietf-idn-idna)
Preparation of Internationalized Host Names (draft-ietf-idn-nameprep)
Proposal for a determining process of ACE identifier
(draft-ietf-idn-aceid)
Japanese characters in multilingual domain name label
(draft-ietf-idn-jpchar)
Traditional and Simplified Chinese Conversion (draft-ietf-idn-tsconv)
Hangeul NAMEPREP recommendation version 1.0(draft-ietf-idn-hangeulchar)
Improving ACE using code point reordering v1.0(draft-ietf-idn-lsb-ace)
AMC-ACE-Z (draft-ietf-idn-amc-ace-z)

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>
To: "Xiaodong LEE" <lee@cnnic.net.cn>
Cc: <idn@ops.ietf.org>; <jet-member@nic.ad.jp>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:08 AM
Subject: [JET-member 491] Re: [idn] Traditional-simplified, yet again


> Thank you for this message, particularly the tone of it. You talk
> about a draft and ask us to read it carefully. I would very much like
> to do that (and would certainly like to read it more than the recent
> messages!), but I don't know which draft you are speaking about. Was
> it announced and I missed it? Or will it be ready soon?
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium