[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)

To: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>, "David Hopwood" <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>, <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
From: "Kent Karlsson" <kentk@md.chalmers.se>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:10:26 +0100
References: <011f01c16b65$cbf0a820$0667000a@jamessonyvaio> <003201c16b8a$e64adf90$b4e21081@chalmers95a69n> <076b01c16bc4$b31897e0$ec1bd9d2@temp> <3BF063C0.70658775@zetnet.co.uk> <085101c16bf0$3b0b8ba0$ec1bd9d2@temp>

> one of the jamo sequence he raised was illegal one ( choseong+jungseong+filler is illegal,
> choseong+jungseong is enough). 

I had no such example. Look again!  The "FILLER"s are problematic, but was
not the main point in my previous e-mail.

> NFC already  map modern jamo sequences into modern hangul syllables.

Not for the example I picked (in it's full three-character form)!  It was not a random
example, but there are thousands of similar instances.


        Kind regards
        /kent k

References:
- [idn] reordering strawpoll
  - From: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
- Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
  - From: "Kent Karlsson" <kentk@md.chalmers.se>
- Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
  - From: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
- Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
  - From: David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>
- Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
  - From: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] summary of reordering discussion
Next by Date: Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
Prev by thread: Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
Next by thread: Re: Hangul and IDN (was Re: [idn] reordering strawpoll)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread