Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

> > Next questions then:
> > 1. Who have confirmed it in Japan and Korea as stated in your draft.
> >
> > 2. You have two source. How you put it as one table? You did not use
the
> > table as-it-is in its original form right?
> Not correct !

Okay, in others words, the two source you reference are exactly
identitical?

> > 3. If you indeed combine the two sources into a single table, I
presumed
> > there would be many overlaps in the tables but still some conflicts.
> > What about those conflicting cases and how have you deal with them?

SInce the table is identitical, then this question is irrelevant.

And I am waiting for the last 2 questions, thanks.

> > 3. Why did the authorities creates such tables in the first place?
What
> > is their written policy on the stablility of the tables and futures
> > changes? What is the procedure for someone to add/delete/modifyt (if
> > possible) such tables if someone thinks there is a need to update
it?
> >
> > 4. Have it been go thru codepoint experts review by UTC or IRG etc?
> >
> > Standard questions which someone would ask...:-) very simply to the
one
> > asked about reordering.