Re: [idn] IDN rechartering rev 3

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

There are many good reasons:

1. it is clear our action items have missing items. some of the
   action items are outdated and no longer relevant to the group.

2. the clarification of many technical information we now know
   which we dont 2 years ago.

3. we started with an "explorative" charter to look for a solution.
   time to refocus the group to actually produce a solution.

   (unless of course we want the group to continue this never
   ending quest to find the perfect solution).

4. goal & milestone is outdated too.

So I do not agree with your assessment of no "good reasons for changing
the current charter". Leaving it alone is not an option.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
To: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Cc: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] IDN rechartering rev 3


>
> James Seng/Personal wrote:
> >
> > Please suggest alternative wordings. Thanks.
>
> I have yet to hear a good reason for changing the current charter, as
> provided at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/idn-charter.html. As
such,
> my alternative would be to leave the current charter alone.
>
> --
> Eric A. Hall
http://www.ehsco.com/
> Internet Core Protocols
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
>