Re: [idn] Re: hostname history hell

["Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>]

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:

> as i thought, "3.*." was both valid, post-1123, and worked too.

Urgh. IMO "3.domain.dom" would be an illegal hostname since the relative
label would only contain a single character, which would violate RFC952.
"30.domain.dom" would be legal IMO.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/