[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-04

To: "David Hopwood" <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>, <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-04
From: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:57:01 +0800
References: <022e01c1718d$4c0dba20$a4615ed3@jamessonyvaio> <3BFA3816.3063B762@zetnet.co.uk> <01c401c171e8$27c7c740$0201000a@jamessonyvaio> <3BFAB7EC.5D48C61F@zetnet.co.uk>

> It's pointless for IANA to do this, because all of the current
proposals
> call for only one ACE. IANA's role is to handle registration where
there
> is an ongoing requirement to assign "numbers"/identifiers from a
defined
> set of alternatives. It doesn't choose what the set of alternatives
is,
> and there is no need to involve it in one-off decisions that can just
> as easily be taken by working groups.

Note:

"A prefix for AMC-Z will be assigned using the normal IESG/IANA/
RFC-editor procedure for coordinating assignment of protocol
parameters during IETF last call and publication as an RFC."

-James Seng

References:
- [idn] comments on IDNA-04
  - From: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
- Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-04
  - From: David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>
- Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-04
  - From: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
- Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-04
  - From: David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] hostname history hell
Next by Date: Re: [idn] hostname history hell
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-04
Next by thread: Re: [idn] comments on IDNA-05
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread