Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

[liana Ye <liana.ydisg@juno.com>]

James: 

  My take on Prof. Tseng's respond is that he does not
consider JET is the authoritive agent for the table mapping 
due to:
 1) TSconv table is only covers Chinese, they are a part of 
   Chinese script requirement;

 2) Unsolved Kanji/Hanja/Han conflicts are identified and 
 provided as a part of IDN CJK block requirement from JET;

 3) There is no complete solution provided from JET or from
  one or more tables from JET, JET is hoping to put the 
  requirement in front of IETF for IETF to consider a solution. 

 So, IETF has the authority to use the tables, or to come up 
specifications for JET to produce tables to comply with 
Unicode CJK standard :-)

Liana


<tsenglm@cc.ncu.edu.tw> writes:
> Dear James:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-idn@ops.ietf.org] 
> > On Behalf Of James Seng/Personal
> > Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 7:31 AM
> > To: tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw; Erin Chen
> > Cc: liana Ye; idn@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified 
> > Chinese Conversion[version01]
> > 
> > 
> > >         The  original (SC, TC) pair is keep for checking 
> reference ,
> > but if
> > > one character has different meanning and usage in different 
> > CJK area,
> > the
> > > relation of 1-1 mapping can be  reduced to checking-state to let 
> CJK
> > people
> > > can keep their local need and also to match the ALL-SC, ALL-TC
> > approach.
> > 
> > Okay, let me try to see if I can get this right on the table 
> mappings:
> > 
> > 1. The original source of the table mapping is from A 
> > Complete List of Simplified Chinese Characters and Dictonary 
> > of Chinese Characters Variant.
> > 
> The Authority of  Complete List of Simplified Chinese Characters is 
> PRC government, It MUST  be keep.  The  draft  reference it .
> > 2. JET members have adopted these tables, combined them into 
> > a single tables.
> > 
> > 3. JET members then later remove all conflicting cases with 
> > Japanese & Korean pairs from the tables.
> > 
> > If these are true, then JET could be considered as the 
> > authority for the tables mappings. 
>        The implied result is not correct . The original authority of 
>  this SC/TC mapping table can not be changed by referencer. 
> 
> L.M.Tseng
>