Re: [idn] IDN charter update - revision 4

[David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Eric A. Hall" wrote:
> James Seng/Personal wrote:
> 
> > within existing DNS mechanisms.  Hence this enhancement to the DNS
> > involves only end-user software.  No other modules within the DNS will
> > need to be changed.
> 
> This forbids any methods for converting IDNs to ACE for storage in a zone.

... among other things, but yes, that's sufficient reason in itself why
these sentences should not be included.

> Those two sentences should be removed.

I agree completely.

- -- 
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5  0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBPAKyxTkCAxeYt5gVAQFczQgArS9mYG/JLiiMauez4j8E0F+QTcJJ/PmK
d7j4xMMmxpm4IC0S+MVD48Tv3EjtOu9bNg1nfoOZIvo3D+ZJye38Tew954CZNicU
Qg09S0VELCoRPU76rtLOzJlj/S51XLnjK/LuJFK1iOyAlmRpp6cTFSN53Vjk2cZs
SAbtcHpYQa0RXzbdJeHiuv1W9gXOVXVYvS6AgMY1o9XcavirRj2tNtcUb46BQ4ta
XcUMGV6mB/LqrjnFJ6D/ZYegb3+AmsbDle4YMU2OMtm7hibCVtdFG4cFWIksc9uH
MAfH5RtiNlU7kEUgpgVnPV3/236U/D/nYYeBP8pdY5BY3XrBp8U0gg==
=jEvt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----