Re: Combining characters (was: Re: [idn] hostname historyhell)

[David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

David Hopwood wrote:
> David Hopwood wrote:
> > There are several ways of solving all the problems simultaneously:
> >
> >  a) NFC o fold o NFC.
> 
> I should clarify that the functions I'm referring to here in a)-f) are
> alternatives for the function that is used by applications to test
> equivalence of valid encoded names. In the case of g),

That should be "in the case of f)".

> unnormalised names are not valid, so it is sufficient to use ASCII case
> folding to test equivalence.
> 
> >  b) foldafter o NFC o foldbefore, where foldafter handles only <dotted-I>
> >     and <ypogegrammeni> and foldbefore handles the rest.
> 
> Actually a) and b) define the same function, so they should be considered
> as a single alternative; call it ab).

- -- 
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5  0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBPAN1nTkCAxeYt5gVAQGq9wf/aNPKqyxe6LB4itwDxH445HBLe5nj3ehN
pSPnLaceyPpmgkpjSTzGAeKo7ZWmy3HT57S5APBNcoXqoqmlwTmSLqyEkRG56ZQr
zgd0/Nmf448YZrm9In5XjQ1zt72nQh5ctHxcXq1fDSUh3i8xn1mZrgb29KCIR2sz
mwPnzB6MyibhIQenxDatxJrMP2JOOyhLt/x551vBMdBpSQnp2dSPKLJ9jLUjEX4P
SeanT/VPoYyp2moGlg0RQReVPqnzgzYb5zjxhiU8gHlM64oy3ZYPhPqoAl+FRzrG
PP3UUCovxBrp9OkBhq3VxWSYWEhCkUCrYRWY8HDMnVG0afWERE6Fjw==
=JzN4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----