Re: [idn] tsconv

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

In Minnapolis meeting, the requirements document was clarify to capture
technical requirements only. User requirements will come in other
documents.

Having said that, the decision whether to add user requirements is not
for me to make but for the group and the editor to see the relevances.
Personally, I prefer them to be separate documents.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "liana Ye" <liana.ydisg@juno.com>
To: <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Cc: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] tsconv


> Just a thought on improve [Requirement-09]:
>
> Is it possible to put [Requirement-09] [CJK]
> and [TSconv]'s User Requirements together for
> an RFC?
>
> The reason is that CJK is demonstrating the heart
> of IDN problem, which addresses Latin/Armenian
> Vietnemese/Han problems as well as Indic
> language requirements.
>
> Liana
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:37:01 +0800 "James Seng/Personal"
> <jseng@pobox.org.sg> writes:
> > Hi Deng Xiang,
> >
> > The TSCONV draft seem to comprises of 3 different section, namely,
> >
> > 1. User Requirements
> > 2. CJK Validation
> > 3. HSE
> >
> > is it possible for you to consider spliting them into 3 separate
> > draft?
> >
> > -James Seng
> >
> >