Re: [idn] idn wg proposed agenda

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

To answer your question about 7 supportor process, the current process
requires you to send an explicit email to the co-chairs, Marc and
myself, with the name of your draft and your 7 supporters.

Definition of supporters means people who will be willing to speak up
and support your draft. (In your case, I dont see anyone else.)

But your note to addressing the vague process is noted. Depending on the
outcome of the working group and the time we have, it may be worthwhile
to revisit the issues of how to defined core interest.

-James Seng

> For example, my draft-ieft-idn-step has 13 supporters
> including me. Among the 13 there are 4 active
> participants speakers on the list.  The rest choose
> to remain lurk now or not bother due to many
> reasons.  I used to work off line on this, and is
> discouraged to continue  working with people off
> line.
>
> While others were never posting any message,
> but it counted for voting.  To speak about reasonable
> judgement on who's opinion can be counted for
> support is too vage for me to follow.
> In my judgement, all the 13 are quanlified to support
> the draft.  Some people tell me, that they can not
> answer all the questions that may be raised, so
> they prefer to stay silent.   Can the group comes
> up with better guide lines?