[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] statements from wg co-chairs

To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>,Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
Subject: Re: [idn] statements from wg co-chairs
From: bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:56:06 -0500
Cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>,idn@ops.ietf.org,jseng@pobox.org.sg,brunner@nic-naa.net
In-Reply-To: <200112101454.fBAEsll40974@nic-naa.net>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:44:20 EST." <40290000.1007995458@classic>

  I agree with Eric's reasoning. I would oppose moving to final protocol 
drafts without first getting agreement on a final requirements draft.

Bill Semich

At 09:54 AM 12/10/2001 -0500, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
>Marc,
>
>I look forward to your analysis as eagerly as I look forward to your
>conclusions, and hope that one always accompanies the other.
>
>You propose to abandon the requirements draft and start something else.
>
>I didn't agree with your proposal. Is that clearer?
>
>Eric

References:
- Re: [idn] statements from wg co-chairs
  - From: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
- Re: [idn] statements from wg co-chairs
  - From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] naming syntax rules
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Future of the requirements document
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] statements from wg co-chairs
Next by thread: 여러분의 흥분지수을 200% 상승 시키겠습니다.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread