Re: [idn] Future of the requirements document

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

James,

> The minutes of the meeting will be posted soon. You can draw your own
> conclusion on the "rough consensus" then.

You are referring to the "rough consensus" of those contributors who were
in a room in Salt Lake City. While interesting, the working group process
places the venue in which "rough consensus" authoritatively forms in the
working group itself.

> But your objection to drop requirements is noted.

Good.

> ps: comparing criteria for wg i-ds and WG co-chairs proposed next step
> is apple and orange.

The issue here is the openness of the process of the IDN WG.

Please see rfc2026, section 6.5.

Your failure to observe open review will result in a my making a second
assertion of process error.

Eric