Re: [idn] Future of the requirements document

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

Dave,

I don't need, or expect, a ground swell. This isn't a popularity contest.

There are some questions:

	are requirements a technical necessity?

	is the process of transition from a WG with a document under the
	change control of the WG, to a WG without that document, within
	what we know of as the IETF's process?

In my opinion, absence of requirements is a technical error.

In my opinion, the transition attempted is a process error.

Thanks for the note. I appreciate your views. You've mine.

Eric