Re: [idn] Prohibit CDN code points

[hoho <hoho@iis.sinica.edu.tw>]

曾老師，

我們還是得注意 Paul 問的問題，也就是在英文 domain之下建立中文domain,
例如 中文.harvard.edu。由於缺乏接納包含他們在內的中文使用者的機制，
cDNC很容易被他們冠以排外之名。

在IETF的環境下，我們提供的答案還是要得到他們的共識。

建明

tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw 寫入：

> Hi ! Paul  & all :
>               If we switch-off  the code point of  ideograph  temporary
> then the others can go forward and let CDN society has enough time to
> discuss and to solve the TC/SC problems to switch-on quickly . The delay
> influence the current gTLD registration will be  minimum.  If  the ML(.com)
> are opened it can help to supply more path to solve language conflictions in
> different country/region , so the solution can be get and selected if more
> path existed.
>
> L.M.Tseng
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>
> To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [idn] Prohibit CDN code points
>
> > At 12:32 PM -0500 1/21/02, ben wrote:
> > >So the question still remains... what to do about the current gTLD
> > >registrations if infact we want to prohibit CDNs.
> >
> > There is certainly more than one question if we want to prohibit CDNs.
> >
> > - What do companies who are not in a ccTLD do if they want to use
> > Chinese names in their domain names? For example, it would make sense
> > for a company that has a Chinese subsidiary to want to use that name
> > in a domain name under their primary name, such as
> > <Chinese-name>.company-name.com.
> >
> > - Looking one level up, if ICANN decides to allow internationalized
> > TLDs (as many of us hope they will), will Japan and Korea be forced
> > to use unnatural spellings of their names? For how long?
> >
> > - There are tens of millions of Chinese people who do not live in
> > China or Taiwan. Should those people be forced to register only in
> > .tw or .cn in order to use their personal or company names?
> >
> > - What do Japanese and Koreans do if rendering their names
> > phonetically is inexact? For example, homonyms are quite common in
> > Japanese (I don't know about Korean), and the current proposal
> > restricts people and companies to fighting to be first to register a
> > phonetic homonym when there would be no fight for them using Han.
> >
> > There are certainly many other questions that this proposal (for
> > which there is no Internet Draft, by the way) brings up.
> >
> > --Paul Hoffman, Director
> > --Internet Mail Consortium
> >