Re: [idn] Prohibit CDN code points

["Edmon" <edmon@neteka.com>]

Hi Jaap,
But I dont think this is the real issue.  What I hear is that people want to
have an option to implement it and they want a set of standardized options.
I believe our job is to create the standardized set of options and allow
implementors to pick and choose.  If you think it is advisable to caution
the implementors of these options, that is another issue.
Edmon


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaap Akkerhuis" <jaap@sidn.nl>
>     Hi Patrik,
>
>     Additional and optional character equivalence preparation by zone is
>     possible.
>
> But very undesirable. It will be very had to explain why the matching
> is different in different zones. And I predict that when there are
> conflicts about the names and they are caused by these different
> matching rules, the lawyers will care less about the explanation.
>
> Don't go this road!
>
> jaap
>