Re: [idn] Mapping and Prohibit of code points

[YangWoo Ko <newcat@spsoft.co.kr>]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:54:33AM +0100, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> 
> > Your conclusion seems to be too hasty. As far as I can tell from postings
> > so far, they do not want "pre-" matured solution to be deployed which will
> > prevent deployment of "well-" matured solution in the future. That's it.
> > 
> > As Kenny Huang suggested, if nobody had a tangible solution right now in
> > hand, please make this off-topic for a while, and wait for good solution.
> 
> Clarifying question: You could be suggesting two very different things and
> I'd like to understand which one it is.
> 1. All work in the IDN WG should be suspended while we wait for a good
> solution. 2. We should wait discussing a claimed good solution until there is
> a clear
>    Internet-Draft specifying such a solution and meanwhile proceed with the
>    documents that are in working group last call.
> 
> Which one did you mean?
> 
> Thanks,
>   Erik

Dear Erik Nordmark,

Thank you for giving me a chance to clarify my statement.

It is too late to select option 1. So, I can not but select option 2.
But, I have not seen "a claimed good solution" yet. Instead, what Chinese
friends suggested is just exclusion of Chinese characters code range 
for this round of standardization, just like we are doing for some
prohibited characters. I wish Chinese friends may find good solution 
in the near future, and then we can re-start discussion based on that 
solution. 

If you know what "a claimed good solution" is, please let me know of it.

My best regards

-- 
/*------------------------------------------------
YangWoo Ko : newcat@spsoft.co.kr
We Invent Enterprise Software Solutions
and Make You Secure & Powerful.
------------------------------------------------*/