[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
- To: "'IETF idn working group'" <idn@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
- From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:50:00 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam M. Costello [mailto:idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:43 PM
> To: IETF idn working group
> Subject: Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
>
>
> That's one of the reasons I don't like capitalizing those words. What
> if I'm reading a spec in which "must" is usually capitalized, but in one
> sentence it is lowercase. Am I required to obey that sentence or not?
> At that point I think we're making distinctions that don't exist.
I recently (in the last month) went through the exact same issue with a
draft that had been sent to the IESG after WG last call. I ended up having
to change non-normative uses of the 2119 terms to synonyms like "can" and
"might", and use upper case for the directives, to eliminate possible
confusion. YMMV.
-Scott-