[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should

To: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:40:03 -0800
Cc: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20020131212739.GA22831@nicemice.net>
References: <33122220.1012465219@localhost><Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1012393824.16186.nordmark@bebop.france><20020130043102.GE32582@nicemice.net><Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1012393824.16186.nordmark@bebop.france><5.1.0.14.0.20020130142626.0175ee70@127.0.0.1><33122220.1012465219@localhost>

At 09:27 PM 1/31/2002 +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote:
>If there is no rough consensus, I can only use my own best judgement,

or you could take the safest path.

This means limiting the use of those words to only normative references, 
and use other vocabulary for other purposes.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>

References:
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
Next by Date: Re: [idn] stringprep comment 2
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
Next by thread: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread