Re: [idn] Re: peanut gallery

["ben" <ben@cc-www.com>]

Hi Kenny,

Thanks for your reply.  However, just a friendly reminder that Adam's
suggestion is still *only a suggestion*.  As IDNA's last call
continues to move forward, I hope the WG gets to see your proposal(s)
soon.

Thanks,
Ben


---- Original Message -----
From: "Kenny Huang" <huangk@alum.sinica.edu>
To: "ben" <ben@cc-www.com>; "IETF idn working group"
<idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:42 PM
Subject: RE: [idn] Re: peanut gallery


Dear Ben and Adam,

Thanks for your suggestion. This could be one option for Han users.
I've proposed phased implementation for IDNA, that would be another
compromise.

Cheers

Kenny Huang


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ben [mailto:ben@cc-www.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:46 PM
> To: IETF idn working group; Kenny Huang
> Subject: Re: [idn] Re: peanut gallery
>
>
> Hi Kenny,
>
> >
> > That might prohibit a few characters unnecessarily, but it will
make
> > sure that Taiwan, Japan, and Korea are able to use all their
> characters,
> > and will leave the maximum flexibility for China & Singapore to
> define
> > how to fold the remaining characters if they decide that's what
they
> > want to do.
> >
> > I wouldn't recommend this course, but if most of the Chinese
> community
> > wanted to do this, I don't see why the rest of us should object.
> >
>
> Adam's suggestion seems like a resonable compromise (but even more
> important, a *do-able* compromise).  It will allow our friends in
the
> Chinese community as much time as it needs to come up with a TC<->SC
> solution and yet still allow IDN to move forward as the majority of
> this WG wants.
>
> Please let me know what you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>