[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of InternationalizedStrings

To: simon+idn@josefsson.org, idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of InternationalizedStrings
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 16:01:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <iluptz997ev.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <200205300842.g4U8gl209938@odin.France.Sun.COM><ilu7klmx7n9.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <25020324.1022763672@localhost><iluptz997ev.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>

--On 2002-06-02 14.44 +0200 simon+idn@josefsson.org wrote:

> So it appears as if the statement isn't strictly true?

This is also true. I am discussing the issue about 3.1 versus 3.2 with
officers of the Unicode Consortium as we speak. I have requested some
conclusion no later than friday this coming week, which I will report back
to this wg (if not they send it to the mailing list directly).

  paf

References:
- [idn] :Re: Last Call: Preparation of Internationalized Strings ('strin
  - From: Erik Nordmark - Sun Microsystems <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of Internationalized Strings ('strin
  - From: Simon Josefsson <simon+idn@josefsson.org>
- Re: [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of InternationalizedStrings ('strin
  - From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of Internationalized Strings
  - From: simon+idn@josefsson.org

Prev by Date: [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of Internationalized Strings
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of InternationalizedStrings
Previous by thread: [idn] Re: :Re: Last Call: Preparation of Internationalized Strings
Next by thread: [idn] Re: Last Call: Preparation of Internationalized Strings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread