[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, andcomplete?
Soobok said:
Copy&Paste operations from such legacy applications into other applications
may not preserve the intended character glyph informations
determined by char sets+font sets.
That will pose another interoperablility problems to end users.
Soobok:
IMP, inoperable problems to end users will happen regardless of what
the IDN does. Copy&Paste operations (legacy or otherwise) are not
uniform across platforms and nothing this WG (or any WG) does will
fix that.
However, Copy&Paste operations (at least in the Macintosh) are
becoming much more complex than they were and what they would appear.
While the specifics of what is evolving in the Copy&Paste world is
beyond the interest of this WG, I foresee an end user OS software
solution to your concerns. I do not expect this WG providing (or even
having the means to provide) a solution to that problem.
tedd
--
http://sperling.com
- References:
- Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
- From: Dan Oscarsson <Dan.Oscarsson@trab.se>
- Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper,adequate, and complete?
- From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
- Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
- From: "Mark Davis" <mark@macchiato.com>
- Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
- From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net>
- Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
- From: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>
- Re: [idn] Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete?
- From: "Soobok Lee" <lsb@postel.co.kr>