[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate,and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)

To: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>, Soobok Lee <lsb@postel.co.kr>
Subject: Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate,and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:51:11 -0400
Cc: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020622123317.02d425d0@jay.songbird.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020622123317.02d425d0@jay.songbird.com>

--On Saturday, 22 June, 2002 12:39 -0700 Dave Crocker
<dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

>...
> For that matter, I suspect most TLD registries neither know nor
> care about the technical details of UTF-8 vs. ACE, or the like.
> They merely want a functioning, standard, interoperable IDN.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but most users of applications
and the data associated with TLD registries neither know nor care
whether the get their "functioning, standard, interoperable
'IDN'" in the DNS or somewhere else entirely, just so long as the
mechanism meets they needs and is "functioning, standard, and
interoperable".

    john

References:
- Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Next by Date: Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Next by thread: Re: [idn] IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread