[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Document Status?

To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status?
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:07:31 -0700
Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <p05111a00b9955d205ecd@[165.227.249.18]>
References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020830092156.042c6600@jay.songbird.com><"Your message with ID" <3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60336FDA3@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com><5.1.1.2.2.20020830092156.042c6600@jay.songbird.com>

At 10:38 AM 8/30/2002 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:

The sky is not falling, Dave.
A new draft that we believe meets the IESG's request for clarifications has already been turned into the Internet Drafts repository but has not been announced by the IETF Secretariat yet.

Paul, it would be far more helpful to see responses to the particulars, rather than this sort of dismissive, handwaving condescension.

It is absolutely fine for my concerns to be unwarranted.

What is not fine is the continuing failure to address those concerns, with explanations that make clear why they are not warranted.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: "James Seng" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>

References:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- [idn] Document Status?
  - From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread