Re: [idn] IDNA text presentation (was Document Status?)

[Soobok Lee <lsb@postel.co.kr>]

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:24:52AM +0800, James Seng wrote:
> I think you got this part of the history part seriously wrong. This working
> group existed even before MINC is formed.

Ah, MINC is not the one, Sorry. But many of us know what the history is about.
Any "groups" of people and commerical organization have proper rights to make 
their voices organized in this WG. My concern is about the attitude and spirit 
of those groups.

> 
> And no, I don't work for any IDN vendor or any IDN related business anymore.

I am not saying about your affiliations. I understand your jealousy for IDN.
I hope you also pay full respects to other one's jealousy for IDN, which may
have different angles and viewpoints than yours.

Cheers,

Soobok lee

> 
> -James Seng
> 
> > As far as i know, this WG (and the chairs) had been originated from IDN WG
> of
> > MINC which was a consortium of commercial IDN vendors. This WG , as i feel
> > for one year of regular participation, has been biased in favor of
> > commercial IDN vendors and their agendas. of course, some participants
> have
> > stand on the comsumer/end user side and tried to neutralize this WG.
>