[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Document Status?

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>,IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] Document Status?
From: "vinton g. cerf" <vinton.g.cerf@wcom.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 09:35:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1031387498.22281.nordmark@bebop.france>
References: <"Your message with ID <20020902014035.GA25856"@nicemice.net>

I think erik is right about that - despite the misnomer (in my opinion), better to get on with implementation experience than continue to argue over intangibles.

v

At 10:31 AM 9/7/2002 +0200, Erik Nordmark wrote:
>But even having this discussion seems to be a distraction from
>gettting IDNA finished.

Vint Cerf
SVP Architecture & Technology
WorldCom
22001 Loudoun County Parkway, F2-4115
Ashburn, VA 20147
703 886 1690 (v806 1690)
703 886 0047 fax

References:
- Re: [idn] Document Status?
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] Cut&paste discussion
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Document Status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread