[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] homograph attacks

To: idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:00:32 -0800
Cc: William Tan <wil@dready.org>, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>, Michel Suignard <michelsu@windows.microsoft.com>, "Kane, Pat" <pkane@verisign.com>, ericj@shmoo.com, tedd <tedd@sperling.com>, dam@icann.org
In-reply-to: <4213B916.8030108@vanderpoel.org>
References: <FD16260E2EDF204E80A22FB904A425C30BCA67BD@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4212EF44.4040208@v.loewis.de> <421348F8.9060406@dready.org> <4213B916.8030108@vanderpoel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)

Perhaps "immediately" was too strong a word, and arrogant. My apologies. Any such changes should be carefully considered of course.

Erik

Erik van der Poel wrote:

Also, it seems to me that registries like COM could "stop the bleeding" (for now) by immediately deploying systems that enforce a policy where registrations for languages for which they do not have tables are rejected.

References:
- RE: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: "Michel Suignard" <michelsu@windows.microsoft.com>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: William Tan <wil@dready.org>
- Re: [idn] homograph attacks
  - From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Next by Date: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Next by thread: Re: [idn] homograph attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread