Re: question on SMIv2 compliance statements

[dperkins@snmpinfo.com]

HI,

The below is illegal, as well as duplicate GROUP specifications
in module-compls, and duplicate specifications in agent-caps. 

On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:

> 
> Is the following legal in SMIv2 (RFC 2580)?
> 
> xyzMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
>     [...]
>     OBJECT	foo
>     SYNTAX	[...]
>     DESCRIPTION "..."
>     OBJECT	foo
>     SYNTAX	[...]
>     DESCRIPTION "..."
>     [...]
> 
> In other words: Is it legal to have multiple OBJECT statements for the
> same object in a single MODULE-COMPLIANCE macro invocation?
> 
> What do existing compilers do in this case?
> 
> /js

Regards,
/david t. perkins