[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ops-endpoint-mib-08.txt

To: tnadeau@cisco.com
Subject: Re: draft-ops-endpoint-mib-08.txt
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 18:57:22 +0200
CC: kzm@cisco.com, mibs@ops.ietf.org, csrinivasan@tachion.com, arun@force10networks.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:59:07 -0700
Envelope-to: mibs-data@psg.com

>>>>> Thomas D Nadeau writes:

>> Note that this construction also won't work with non-global IPv6
>> addresses.

Thomas> I don't understand. Please explain why it will not
Thomas> work.  Please also recommend how we can make it work.

Sorry, forget my comment. I got confused because the current IANA
TAddress is slightly different from RFC 2851 in how it handles IPv6
addresses.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder      Technical University Braunschweig
<schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>  Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks
Phone: +49 531 391 3289    Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fax:   +49 531 391 5936    <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>

Prev by Date: Re: Conventions for representing inheritance in MIBs
Next by Date: FW: Conventions for representing inheritance in MIBs
Prev by thread: Re: draft-ops-endpoint-mib-08.txt
Next by thread: DEFVAL for DateAndTimes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread