[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advice on restricting SIZE of InetAddress in INDEX?

To: fred@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Advice on restricting SIZE of InetAddress in INDEX?
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:12:48 +0200
CC: fenner@research.att.com, mibs@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 06:13:44 -0700
Envelope-to: mibs-data@psg.com


>>>>> Fred Baker writes:

Fred> I have seen at least one attempt to use MAC Addresses in that
Fred> context. I wouldn't do that.

Without understanding the context: If this is true, then InetAddress
is the wrong choice anyway.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder      Technical University Braunschweig
<schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>  Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks
Phone: +49 531 391 3289    Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fax:   +49 531 391 5936    <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>

Prev by Date: RE: V5.2 MIBs?
Next by Date: TCs for transport addresses and network addresses
Prev by thread: Re: Advice on restricting SIZE of InetAddress in INDEX?
Next by thread: Conventions for representing inheritance in MIBs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread