Re: [RMONMIB] Overflow Counters (was comments ondraft-ietf-rmonmib-dsmon-mib-02.txt)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@vvnet.com>]

On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Andy Bierman wrote:

> I would like to propose that it is time to stop duplicating Counter64
> objects in MIBs with a "Counter32/Overflow32 pair". It is time to
> require SNMPv2C support in applications to access 64-bit counters.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Should that not say "require SNMPv3 support"?  The last time I
looked SNMPv2C was an experimental protocol, not a standard.  A
conformant SNMP implementation will support at least one of SNMPv1
or SNMPv3, but there is no requirement that it support SNMPv2C.

//cmh